<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From My Inbox &#8211; Special Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datewrecks.com/2009/05/from-my-inbox-special-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datewrecks.com/2009/05/from-my-inbox-special-edition/</link>
	<description>The Bottom Of The Online Dating Barrel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 02:45:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor the Vigorous</title>
		<link>http://datewrecks.com/2009/05/from-my-inbox-special-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-4663</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor the Vigorous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datewrecks.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/from-my-inbox-special-edition/#comment-4663</guid>
		<description>Thank you. 
I&#039;ve never seen a case of douchebag...helping... himself...based on the internet, no matter how hard I&#039;ve looked. A little bit of my faith in humanity is restored...
(A 16 year old cynic, folks!  What a world the interwebs are, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.<br />
I&#8217;ve never seen a case of douchebag&#8230;helping&#8230; himself&#8230;based on the internet, no matter how hard I&#8217;ve looked. A little bit of my faith in humanity is restored&#8230;<br />
(A 16 year old cynic, folks!  What a world the interwebs are, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami</title>
		<link>http://datewrecks.com/2009/05/from-my-inbox-special-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datewrecks.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/from-my-inbox-special-edition/#comment-4073</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll fix it for you -- it&#039;s a  thing, not a [ and ] thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll fix it for you &#8212; it&#8217;s a  thing, not a [ and ] thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Blah</title>
		<link>http://datewrecks.com/2009/05/from-my-inbox-special-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datewrecks.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/from-my-inbox-special-edition/#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>Hey...apparently I can&#039;t use markup here. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230;apparently I can&#8217;t use markup here. <img src='http://datewrecks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Blah</title>
		<link>http://datewrecks.com/2009/05/from-my-inbox-special-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-4070</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datewrecks.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/from-my-inbox-special-edition/#comment-4070</guid>
		<description>See, the thing that gets me is &quot;shes a very introverted person and it takes a miracle to get her to talk about anything.&quot;

News flash: when getting YOUR WIFE to talk to you is like pulling teeth, it doesn&#039;t mean she&#039;s an introvert.  It means she hates you.

I mean, seriously.  Being in love with someone (and why get married if you&#039;re not in love?) inherently means that you have emotional intimacy with them.  Which means talking.  I would classify myself as an introvert as well, but when I&#039;m dating someone I&#039;m really into, I open up to him.  This chick isn&#039;t shy, &lt;em&gt;she&#039;s distant&lt;/em&gt;.  Not the same thing.  And therefore I figure she may well be out bangin&#039; other dudes.

Oh, and I know I&#039;m commenting here really really late in the game, but in case anyone ever reads this: on OKCupid, there is no &quot;available&quot; option that you select.  HOWEVER, if you select your status as &quot;married&quot; or &quot;seeing someone&quot; AND select anything other than friendshippy stuff under what you&#039;re looking for, &lt;em&gt;the site will automatically list your relationship status as &quot;available&quot;. &lt;/em&gt; There is a big bold disclaimer at the top of the selection page that explicitly states this, but a lot of people seem to miss it somehow.  Therefore, this guy may not have realized that his profile said he was &quot;available&quot;, and a lot of potential respondents might not realize that the designation is not the same as &quot;single&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, the thing that gets me is &#8220;shes a very introverted person and it takes a miracle to get her to talk about anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>News flash: when getting YOUR WIFE to talk to you is like pulling teeth, it doesn&#8217;t mean she&#8217;s an introvert.  It means she hates you.</p>
<p>I mean, seriously.  Being in love with someone (and why get married if you&#8217;re not in love?) inherently means that you have emotional intimacy with them.  Which means talking.  I would classify myself as an introvert as well, but when I&#8217;m dating someone I&#8217;m really into, I open up to him.  This chick isn&#8217;t shy, <em>she&#8217;s distant</em>.  Not the same thing.  And therefore I figure she may well be out bangin&#8217; other dudes.</p>
<p>Oh, and I know I&#8217;m commenting here really really late in the game, but in case anyone ever reads this: on OKCupid, there is no &#8220;available&#8221; option that you select.  HOWEVER, if you select your status as &#8220;married&#8221; or &#8220;seeing someone&#8221; AND select anything other than friendshippy stuff under what you&#8217;re looking for, <em>the site will automatically list your relationship status as &#8220;available&#8221;. </em> There is a big bold disclaimer at the top of the selection page that explicitly states this, but a lot of people seem to miss it somehow.  Therefore, this guy may not have realized that his profile said he was &#8220;available&#8221;, and a lot of potential respondents might not realize that the designation is not the same as &#8220;single&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoyWonder</title>
		<link>http://datewrecks.com/2009/05/from-my-inbox-special-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>BoyWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datewrecks.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/from-my-inbox-special-edition/#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really concentrating on the few key phrases such as :

&quot;not healthy&quot;...ummm...you got that right..please pass me the full body condom - in green please so I look like Gumby.

And I won&#039;t BORE you all night long..I smell the double entendre burning...

And reading between the line he says he doesn&#039;t want to know what the wifey is up to...I say it sounds more like she&#039;s the one stepping out...take it or leave it..and he&#039;s trying (lamely) to get with the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really concentrating on the few key phrases such as :</p>
<p>&#8220;not healthy&#8221;&#8230;ummm&#8230;you got that right..please pass me the full body condom &#8211; in green please so I look like Gumby.</p>
<p>And I won&#8217;t BORE you all night long..I smell the double entendre burning&#8230;</p>
<p>And reading between the line he says he doesn&#8217;t want to know what the wifey is up to&#8230;I say it sounds more like she&#8217;s the one stepping out&#8230;take it or leave it..and he&#8217;s trying (lamely) to get with the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

